To empower queer women towards greater involvement and presence in the community
OUR VISION
Relief and Resilience Fund for LGBTQ+ persons
Donate to help LGBTQ+ persons impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Now open for applications!
Please write to us if you need help.
Slider
Sayoni is a Singapore-based feminist, volunteer-run organisation that works to uphold human rights protections for queer women, including lesbian, bisexual and transgender women. We organise and advocate for equality in well-being and dignity regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity/expression and sex characteristics.

We believe that everyone has a part to play in improving the lives of LBTQ people. Donate or volunteer with us.

How you can help

Our Work

Research and Advocacy

We collect data and raise awareness about LBTQ issues

Events

We hold events to build community

Donate

Help fund our work

News and Announcements

  • 1

 

One good thing about the movie was the camera angles and shots. Clearly shot by an artisan, often the camera angle said more about the situation than the characters themselves. The actors are undoubtedly excellent as well, conveying much with their expressions and actions. Which was a good salvaging point for the movie, because the dialogue was often puzzling and stilted. Awkward silence dominated the film, or maybe that was a good thing, because such a situation is definitely awkward. The writing, in my opinion, could have been a lot better, especially given such an interesting concept.2

What would make this movie worth watching is also cultural contextualisation, to an extent. I liked seeing the villages, the girls and boys riding home in their bicycles through rice fields, to later transition into motorbikes through expressways, subtly indicating both westernisation and urbanisation of the culture, as well as indicating the coming of age of the characters. The directors also did a good job in building the setting for the film, not shying away from showing algae-coated walls and the bleak greyness of the modern homes, all which accentuates our understanding of the despair and frustration Jonathan has been feeling.

I rather thought the ending was frustrating and lame. It would have been awesome, and taboo-breaking, to let the characters end up in a m-nage-a-trois of sorts, since they are all clearly in love with each other. It need not be a happy ending, but this, in my opinion, is where it should be headed. However, I believe the writers were not courageous enough to go there, and hence we got a very lame, supposed-to-be-artistic kind of ending, which made me want to bash up something when I left the theatre.3

So should you watch the film? Even though I was marginally disappointed with it, I would still think it is worth watching, for all the love-lorn people out there who have been where Jonathan is. Really, who among us has not once been in love with our close/best friend? [Oh please, don't lie... don't think I didn't see that spark in your eyes when you were looking at her.]

Until the next time I have to get out my Kleenex box.

 

  1. One problem I had with this movie is that it is not clear whether Shane loves Jonathan. His behaviour is rather schizophrenic, especially towards the ending. I thought it was a done deal when Shane made the first move and had sex with Jonathan. [The sex scene, by the way, was censored in a highly disconcerting way] Or maybe us not knowing is supposed to be the “artistic” point of the film. [back]
  2. One point the writing stood out was when Shane was picked up by a random guy for sex. This, I thought, was very realistic and well-written, and may encompass the experiences of many a young person who is coming out [back]
  3. What kind of ending is it, for Shane to declare that Jonathan is really your best friend when he confesses he is in love you, after you f***ed him the day before? [back]

Comments   

# nnei 2010-02-01 21:37
#

nei said,

May 11, 2007 at 10:42 pm

Well, it’s clearly a fanfiction-spawning ended that has the scent of ‘fangirl’, I have no idea why.

I think everything makes sense, provided the viewer accepts that Shane is a child who desperately needs love. It’s an uncomfortable assumption, but something there is prior groundwork for, arguably.

Actually, I thought it a relatively happy show/ending. Small, slice-of-life, but a nice little treat of a movie. The only thing I didn’t like was Jonathan’s weird illness. What the hell was that all about….
Reply
# lover 2010-02-01 21:37
#

lover said,

June 8, 2007 at 2:29 pm

movie was beautiful but really frustrating. i just refuse to believe that shane f*cked with him cuz he doesn’t wanna lose him. he must feel something for him.
Reply
# SSonin 2010-02-01 21:38
#

Sonin said,

March 25, 2008 at 3:44 pm

i thought that when Shane said “then you came along, and i can not lose one of you’ with Carrie after he made love with Jonathan.

this show us to realize why Shane want to have “something” deep and down into his mind and Jonathan mind.he may think that can help him keep his best friend who act like want to leave him behind.

but in fact, this will be changing everthing in their life.

and what’s about Carrie? What’s about all girls in gay movies?
Reply
# Linzer 2010-02-01 21:38
#

Linzer said,

May 25, 2009 at 4:55 pm

I think the ending meant when Shane just told Jonathan that he truly was his best friend was that Shane didn’t care that Jonathan was gay or that he loved him. It was that Jonathan would be his friend no matter what. I watched it last night, and I realized you have to connect it to the beginning of the movie. In the beginning Carrie is sitting in between Jonathan and Shane. So I guess that it means that they are still friends, but they aren’t, and maybe that is why Shane remmebers back when they were little. Maybe he wanted to go back to the way things were.

Truthfully, I have no freaking clue. That is pretty much what I got from it.
Reply
# Kriselle 2010-02-01 21:38
#

Kriselle said,

November 11, 2009 at 3:59 pm

I agree with Linzer. I think that Shane, as screwed up as he is, rejected Jonathan and that what he felt for him was nothing but friendship. The sex scene was probably because he was drunk (Jonathan drove home) or he subconsciously knew that it was what Jonathan wanted and it could maybe patch up their torn relationship. Or maybe I’m thinking too deeply of it?
Reply

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Sign up to receive announcements and updates